Compare
Three ways to get AI doing real work.
Rent it from a SaaS vendor, build it on a framework, or own it with Vocion. Here is how the three compare, including the rows where the others win.
Closed SaaS AI
Enterprise chat assistants and agents hosted by the vendor. You sign up, they run everything.
Best when
You want people using AI this afternoon and are fine with the vendor holding the data and the roadmap.
Build on a framework
An agent library such as LangGraph, plus the infrastructure, apps and controls your engineers build around it.
Best when
You have an engineering team that wants to control every line, and time to build what the business sees.
Vocion
Enterprise-grade AI you own. Open source core, running in your AWS account or ours, with apps ready on day one.
Best when
You want real work done now, and you want to keep the agents, the data and the deployment.
Side by side
What you get, and what you keep.
Categories, not vendors: score the one in front of you. Vocion's enterprise rows use the same status as the enterprise page.
Ownership
Runs in your cloud account
- Closed SaaS AI
- Vendor's cloud
- Build on a framework
- Yes, once you build it
- Vocion
- Your AWS, or ours
Records in your own Postgres
- Closed SaaS AI
- Vendor's store
- Build on a framework
- Wherever you put them
- Vocion
- Yes, or ours on Cloud
Open source
- Closed SaaS AI
- Build on a framework
- The library is
- Vocion
- MPL-2.0
Leave with your agents and history
Agents, teams and rules are YAML in your git. Runs and approvals are rows in your Postgres.
- Closed SaaS AI
- Export, if offered
- Build on a framework
- Vocion
Apps
Workforce: agents doing team jobs
- Closed SaaS AI
- Varies by vendor
- Build on a framework
- You build it
- Vocion
Assistants for every person
- Closed SaaS AI
- Build on a framework
- You build it
- Vocion
Software Factory: from ticket to pull request
- Closed SaaS AI
- Varies by vendor
- Build on a framework
- You build it
- Vocion
GTM: research, outreach, pipeline
- Closed SaaS AI
- Varies by vendor
- Build on a framework
- You build it
- Vocion
Time to the first real job
- Closed SaaS AI
- Same day
- Build on a framework
- Weeks to months
- Vocion
- This week, on Vocion Cloud
Enterprise
Dedicated deployment in your AWS
- Closed SaaS AI
- Rarely offered
- Build on a framework
- You run it
- Vocion
- Today
SSO and SCIM
- Closed SaaS AI
- Usually, on top tiers
- Build on a framework
- You build it
- Vocion
- Coming
Multiple orgs, Postgres row-level security
- Closed SaaS AI
- Vendor's tenancy model
- Build on a framework
- You build it
- Vocion
- Coming
Audit log export to your SIEM
- Closed SaaS AI
- Usually, on top tiers
- Build on a framework
- You build it
- Vocion
- On the roadmap
Customer-managed keys
- Closed SaaS AI
- Some vendors
- Build on a framework
- Your KMS, your wiring
- Vocion
- On the roadmap
Trust
Human approval and a record of every run
Who approved what, what the agent read, and what it cost.
How trust works →- Closed SaaS AI
- Varies by vendor
- Build on a framework
- You build it
- Vocion
Cost
Platform fee
- Closed SaaS AI
- Per seat
- Build on a framework
- None for the library
- Vocion
- None for open source
Model spend visible per run
- Closed SaaS AI
- Bundled into the seat
- Build on a framework
- If you instrument it
- Vocion
Running it
Operations you take on
- Closed SaaS AI
- None
- Build on a framework
- All of it
- Vocion
- Some, or none on Cloud
Control over the agent loop
- Closed SaaS AI
- Build on a framework
- Every line
- Vocion
- Open source, set in YAML
Ecosystem and community
- Closed SaaS AI
- Large
- Build on a framework
- Largest
- Vocion
- Smaller
Fair is fair
Where the others win.
If one of these is what matters most to you, it may be the right call.
Closed SaaS AI
Zero operations, same day
Nothing to deploy, patch or upgrade, and people can start the day you sign. If you never want to think about infrastructure, that is worth a lot.
Build on a framework
Maximum control
Every node, prompt and retry is your code. Nothing is decided for you, and the LangChain ecosystem is far larger than ours.
Closed SaaS AI
Identity and audit on the top tier
Many SaaS vendors already sell SSO, SCIM and audit export. In Vocion those are coming or on the roadmap, marked on the enterprise page.
Before you sign
Six questions for any AI vendor.
Including us. Vocion's answers: your AWS account or ours, agents as YAML in your git, records in a Postgres you can take with you, open code, and the cost on every run.
- 01Whose cloud account do our records live in, and can we move them into ours?
- 02If we stop paying, what keeps running, and what do we take with us?
- 03Can our engineers read the code that decides what an agent does?
- 04Which enterprise controls ship today, and which are a roadmap? Ask for the dates.
- 05Can we see what each run cost in model spend, and which team it was for?
- 06Who builds and maintains the apps our teams will actually use?
In depth
Comparing a specific stack?
Row by row, with sources for every claim about the other side and the date we last checked.
Vocion vs.
Hermes + Slack + Obsidian + Mem0
Assembling Hermes, Slack, Obsidian and Mem0 for shared agents means four systems and the glue between them. What one Vocion install has, row by row.
Checked 2026-10-08Read →
Vocion vs.
LangGraph
Build on LangGraph yourself, or start from Vocion, which runs on it and adds the apps, the deployment and the record. A dated, sourced comparison.
Checked 2026-10-08Read →
Vocion vs.
Temporal
Temporal is a durable-execution engine. Vocion is AI you own, with durable runs in its own Postgres. What each gives you, and what you build yourself.
Checked 2026-10-08Read →
Get started
Compare it on your own work.
Bring one job your team does every week. We will run it in a demo on sample data shaped like yours, and show you what you would own at the end.
For your team: a demo built around your job, on sample data.
For your engineers
Run it yourself
The requirements, the AWS path and the repo.